Measure local inference performance
Compare startup time, generation speed, and memory under the same workload.
Learning path
Measure quality and speed, train an adapter or a classifier, and check how a local service behaves under load.
Compare startup time, generation speed, and memory under the same workload.
Compare one and two simultaneous clients, then separate throughput, response time, and memory use.
Sample a protected llama.cpp metrics endpoint during a repeatable workload and distinguish gauges, counters, and client latency.
Compare exact search with HNSW on 30,000 local vectors and measure how search effort changes recall, latency, and index size.
Build a small test set, score outputs against a rubric, and compare revisions fairly.
Run a repeatable check of response shape and task accuracy, record the model identity, and compare a candidate with your baseline.
Run the same checked problem twice, then compare answer accuracy, token use, and response time.
Record a quote with its page and file digest, then detect a revised source before reusing the citation.
Compare English and Spanish transcripts against reference words and score whether important details survived.
Score six labeled questions with different evidence types and compare candidate coverage, answer relevance, and missing-answer behavior.
Test a case where an older handbook and a dated policy mention different values, then make the relevant source rule explicit.
Compare prompting, retrieval, and adapters before committing time and compute to training.
Train an adapter on fictional library requests with MLX LM, then score it against the same base model on held-out examples.
Classify fictional library requests with scikit-learn, check when to send a case for review, and compare a local LLM baseline.
Train a single attention block on fictional sentences and compare training loss, held-out predictions, and the resulting completion.
Learn the request–execute–reply loop with a local dictionary and explicit argument validation.